Reviewing for the Conference
If you are interested in serving as a Reviewer for the 2023 ANZAM Conference, please contact Dr Urs Daellenbach (email@example.com) indicating your areas of research and expertise.
Please note the timing of the review period (July-August) and ensure that you will be available to review typically up to 3 submissions during this time. You are expected to provide constructive advice for authors on how to enhance their research for presentation at the Conference and subsequent publication, along the lines of the review criteria listed below.
Review Process for Submissions
Submissions to the Conference for presentation will be reviewed and authors will be advised of their acceptance by early September 2023.
All Conference submissions will be refereed using a double-blind peer review process. The review criteria include:
– significance/importance of the topic
– conceptual foundation/relevant literature
– suitability of research questions
– aims and objectives
– quality of analysis/coherence of argument
– relevance of findings for theory/policy/practice
– clarity/readability and overall evaluation (including contribution).
After the review period is completed, all reviewers, who have provided complete reviews of submissions, will receive email confirmation of their reviewer activity, which they can add to their Publons (www.publons.com) record and retain for their personal records.